Spotlight Studies Articles Facts Issues Q&A



Q&A

Aren't the facts clear that municipal utilities in Iowa charge customers far less than incumbent utilities?
Why shouldn't the city just use the profits the incumbent utility is making to lower electric bills and help fund city operations?
Won't a new city utility be able to buy electricity at the same prices the investor-owned utility pays?

It is unlikely that a new city utility would be able to buy electricity at the same price the investor-owned utility pays for electricity. Private utilities gets most of their electricity from existing low-cost generating stations. This electricity is available at a much lower price than electricity sold in the open market. Because of its low-cost generation resources, private utilities do not need to purchase much electricity in the open market. Private utilities have some long-term contracts with outside providers for a small portion of its overall load. It addition, it has trading capabilities to buy and sell power when needed for peaking conditions, which is a very complex and risky business requiring great expertise and hedging abilities, which a typical city lacks. Private utilities can buy supplemental power at low rates because it has many transmission connections and itself owns a diverse mixture of generating plants. A typical city lacks these cost management resources and would be more subject to volatile market prices.
If a city forms a government utility, can it later turn back to the investor-owned utility?
Why can't the city build its own power plant?
If Emmetsburg can do it, why can't my town?
Why can't investor-owned utilities unbundle their rates, let the city take over distribution and keep selling the city utility generation and transmission at the current prices?



Current Issues  .  Our Members  .  About IUA  .  Press Room  .  Energy Links  .  Contact  .  Home  .  Site Map  .  Privacy

© 2008 Iowa Utility Association. All rights reserved.