Spotlight Studies Articles Facts Issues Q&A



Q&A

Aren't the facts clear that municipal utilities in Iowa charge customers far less than incumbent utilities?

This is a case of using an average to mislead. Some have higher rates and some have lower. Most of these utilities were formed more than 25 years ago when things were different. Many built and paid off their own generating plants years ago, a far more expensive proposition today, in part because of environmental regulations. Others purchase surplus federal hydroelectric power, no longer available. Starting a utility today would be far more costly. A new utility would have to deal with price spikes and volatility. It is likely that electric rates will go up - not down.
Why shouldn't the city just use the profits the incumbent utility is making to lower electric bills and help fund city operations?
Won't a new city utility be able to buy electricity at the same prices the investor-owned utility pays?
If a city forms a government utility, can it later turn back to the investor-owned utility?
Why can't the city build its own power plant?
If Emmetsburg can do it, why can't my town?
Why can't investor-owned utilities unbundle their rates, let the city take over distribution and keep selling the city utility generation and transmission at the current prices?



Current Issues  .  Our Members  .  About IUA  .  Press Room  .  Energy Links  .  Contact  .  Home  .  Site Map  .  Privacy

© 2008 Iowa Utility Association. All rights reserved.