Spotlight Studies Articles Facts Issues Q&A

Unfounded Claims

Cost, Reliability and Service

Defining Municipalization



Facts: Unfounded Claims

Municipal Utility Unfounded Claims - and Our Response

Claim: A city-run utility will save residents money. In fact, the rates of municipal utilities are lower than Iowa's investor-owned utilities.
Claim: A city utility will take the pressure off our cash-strapped local budget. On average, city utilities in Iowa transfer 6 percent of operating revenues to other city funds, reducing property taxes or paying for swimming pools, community centers and other projects.
Claim: Service will be better and more responsive when we have local control.
Claim: The city will have no problem finding experienced workers because it can just hire the employees of the incumbent private utility.
Claim: After a storm, the city will be able to get mutual aid from other cities with their own utilities.
Claim: After mergers and consolidation, private utilities have closed many small-town service centers. To get good service, cities need local offices and utility employees living in town.
Claim: MidAmerican is pushing legislation that would prevent the formation of new municipal utilities.
Claim: Investor-owned utilities are fighting the establishment of more city utilities because of all the profits they are taking out of our community and sending out of state.
Claim: Long-term electricity contracts are available that will allow a new city utility to lock in low prices. As an example, Indianola has a long-term contract with MidAmerican and residential rates there are lower than the private utility's.
Claim: Municipal utilities in California, including those in such cities as Anaheim, Los Angeles, Pasadena and Sacramento, escaped most of the rate increases and service outages that hit customers of the state's private utilities in 2000 and 2001.
Claim: A city utility would be more able to provide renewable energy.
Claim: A municipal utility provides local control over rates, policies and generation resources.
Claim: Public power would encourage economic development by keeping money in town.
Claim: Even though MidAmerican recently raised its contract price to the Carlisle municipal utility by 47 percent, the city still provides electricity to residents at rates 11.9 percent lower than MidAmerican and to businesses at rates 4.3 percent lower than MidAmerican.

Response: It's worth noting that Carlisle explored several alternatives for providers and found that MidAmerican offered the best deal. Carlisle proves our points that because of market factors today, government utilities buying electricity from outside providers will face significantly higher contract prices going forward than the historical price data that the Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities is citing.

We contend that a startup government utility - facing many new costs that Carlisle does not - would end up with higher rates than MidAmerican's, while exposing its customers to a higher level of risk and lower reliability. As a long-established government-owned utility, Carlisle is free of the heavy, long-term debt that a new government takeover of the electrical system would require. Also, it has no requirement to replace the property taxes that MidAmerican pays. It has no need to recruit and train a workforce, establish billing, meter reading, customer call service, a control center or any of the other startup costs of a new government utility. If it needs to call in outside help in an emergency, Carlisle will have to pay extra for that. Even so, it can sell electricity only slightly below MidAmerican's rates, and under the rate plan it recently announced it will charge more.



Current Issues  .  Our Members  .  About IUA  .  Press Room  .  Energy Links  .  Contact  .  Home  .  Site Map  .  Privacy

© 2008 Iowa Utility Association. All rights reserved.